1xBet vs Melbet Uganda 2026
Existing licence comparison: 11 August 2026
Short answer: do not treat 1xBet and Melbet as interchangeable accounts. This comparison has different legal-entity records for the two brands; it does not establish their ultimate ownership or a shared wallet. Our primary starting point here is the 1xBet Uganda review; the Melbet Uganda review remains an approved alternative.
The links above open our reviews, not a registration form. Compare the same account tasks before using the sponsored links on those reviews.
Are 1xBet and Melbet the same company?
The records in this comparison name Advanced Gaming Limited for the Uganda 1Xbet entry and Caecus N.V. for the international 1xBet terms; Melbet’s published terms name Pelican Entertainment B.V. The Melbet terms were rechecked on 7 September 2026 (UTC); the other licence records retain their dated evidence below. Different contracting names do not, by themselves, prove or disprove a common ultimate owner.
For the user, the practical rule is to verify the exact account’s terms. Do not assume that a login, wallet balance, verification decision or bonus at one brand transfers to the other. Similar menus or games are not evidence of shared account rights. Keep passwords unique and ask the relevant operator about its own account, not a third party offering to move funds between brands.
Licence and cashier comparison
| Check | 1xBet | Melbet |
|---|---|---|
| Uganda licence | Advanced Gaming Limited / NLGRB-BM-26-0206 | Not found in NLGRB list dated 15 May 2026 |
| Offshore entity | Caecus N.V. | Pelican Entertainment B.V. |
| Curaçao licence | OGL/2024/1262/0493 | OGL/2024/561/0554 |
| Uganda bonus | Check live registration | Check live registration |
| Payment limits and withdrawal | Check logged-in cashier | Check logged-in cashier |
Verdict: 1xBet has the stronger Uganda licensing evidence. Melbet’s current Curaçao entity and licence are checkable, but no matching Uganda entry was found. Exact bonus, payment-limit and withdrawal-speed claims were removed as unverified.
The practical difference in Uganda
The decisive distinction is the local licence trail. For 1xBet, a user can start with Advanced Gaming Limited / 1Xbet in the NLGRB publication and then confirm that the exact domain and contracting entity match. For Melbet, the public trail reviewed leads to Pelican Entertainment B.V. and Curaçao; it does not establish an NLGRB relationship.
That does not prove that every 1xBet payment will succeed or that every Melbet dispute will fail. It changes which regulator and complaint route may be available.
Compare the same account tasks
Before choosing, perform these checks in the same session:
- Open the legal terms and record the company/domain.
- Confirm Uganda, UGX and the applicable 25+ rule.
- Inspect MTN MoMo or Airtel Money under Deposit and Withdrawal separately.
- Save current KYC, bonus and complaint terms.
- Compare the exact football or casino product you intend to use—not a permanent catalogue count.
Use the 1xBet registration checklist, Melbet registration checklist and payment hub to keep the evidence comparable.
Decision guide
- Choose the 1xBet path if a matching current Uganda licence and local complaint route are threshold requirements, after confirming the domain/entity.
- Consider Melbet only if you understand the offshore licence position and can independently verify the account, cashier and dispute route.
- Choose neither if the destination changes company/domain unexpectedly, required payment routes are missing, or the live terms are unclear.
No result here is based on an affiliate rate or an unverified bonus headline.
25+ in Uganda. Navigation and account-comparison explanation updated 7 September 2026 (UTC); no new deposit, withdrawal or ownership test is claimed.